General
Courtland L. Hungerford, Respondent, v. Hannah M. Bent, Appellant
130 N.Y. 653·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Courtland L. Hungerford, Respondent, v. Hannah M. Bent, Appellant.
(Argued October 26, 1891;
decided December 1, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made October 1, 1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Edmund L. Pitts for appellant.
John, J. Ryan for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.