Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Marion deV. COTTEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA et al., Defendants-Appellees, 1975 — 515 F.2d 1098 · caselaw · US
General
Marion deV. COTTEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA et al., Defendants-Appellees
515 F.2d 1098·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1975
Before GODBOLD, Circuit Judge, SKELTON, Associate Judge, and GEE, Circuit Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Marion deV. COTTEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 74-2932.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
July 9, 1975.
Rehearing Denied Aug. 14, 1975.
John B. Long, Augusta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.
Gould B. Hagler, Augusta, Ga., for Moretz and Curtis.
Alfred L. Evans, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellees.
Before GODBOLD, Circuit Judge, SKELTON, Associate Judge, and GEE, Circuit Judge.
Of the U. S. Court of Claims, sitting by designation.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
PER CURIAM:
We agree with the findings and legal conclusions of the district court, which appear at 395 F.Supp. 388. The judgment is
Affirmed.