Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Standard Sewing Machine Company, Petitioner, v. Arthur M. Leslie, 1903 — 188 U.S. 740 · caselaw · US
General
Standard Sewing Machine Company, Petitioner, v. Arthur M. Leslie
188 U.S. 740·Supreme Court of the United States·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 546.
Standard Sewing Machine Company, Petitioner, v. Arthur M. Leslie.
January 19, 1903.
Mr. Charles S. Holt and Mr. John Dane, Jr., for the petitioner. Mr. Charles K. Ojjidd and Mr. Cha/rles C. Linthicum for. the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.