Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pedersen v. J. F. Fitzgerald Construction Co., 1943 — 318 U.S. 742 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Pedersen v. J. F. Fitzgerald Construction Co.
318 U.S. 742·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Mr. Justice Murphy and Mr. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 396.
Pedersen v. J. F. Fitzgerald Construction Co.
March 8, 1943.
[MAJORITY]
The judgment entered in this case on February 8, 1943, ante, p. 740, is amended by adding the following: “and without prejudice to a determination of the nature of the employment of any members of the class on whose behalf this suit has been brought.” The petition for rehearing is denied.
Mr. Justice Murphy and Mr. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.