Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frederick P. Forster, Respondent, v. Charles E. Moore et al., Appellants, 1898 — 156 N.Y. 666 · caselaw · US
General
Frederick P. Forster, Respondent, v. Charles E. Moore et al., Appellants
156 N.Y. 666·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frederick P. Forster, Respondent, v. Charles E. Moore et al., Appellants.
Forster v. Moore, 79 Hun, 473, affirmed.
(Argued May 6, 1898;
decided June 7, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 30, 1894, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Robert J. Robeson for appellants.
Henry A. Forster for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except Haight and Martin, JJ., not voting, and Parker, Ch. J., not sitting.