General
Emma D. Pitkin, as Administratrix of the Estate of Fay Pitkin, Deceased, Appellant, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent
185 N.Y. 548·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Emma D. Pitkin, as Administratrix of the Estate of Fay Pitkin, Deceased, Appellant, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent.
Pitkin v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 109 App. Div. 911, affirmed.
(Argued April 19, 1906;
decided May 8, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court' in the fourth judicial department, entered December 4, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term in an action to recover for the alleged negligent killing of plaintiff’s intestate.
Frank C. Sargent for appellant.
Thomas Burns for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Not sitting: Gray, J.