Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Arkansas v. Texas et al., 1953 — 345 U.S. 954 · caselaw · US
General
Arkansas v. Texas et al.
345 U.S. 954·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No.-, Original.
Arkansas v. Texas et al.
Tom Gentry, Attorney General of Arkansas, Kay Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, and E. J. Ball, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, for complainant.
[MAJORITY]
A rule is ordered to issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring the defendants to show cause why leave to file the complaint should not be granted.