Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Santa Fe Pacific Railroad Co. v. Ling, U. S. District Judge, 1946 — 328 U.S. 819 · caselaw · US
General
Santa Fe Pacific Railroad Co. v. Ling, U. S. District Judge
328 U.S. 819·Supreme Court of the United States·1946
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 118, Misc.
Santa Fe Pacific Railroad Co. v. Ling, U. S. District Judge.
May 13, 1946.
Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn., 319 U. S. 21. J. C. Gibson, Lawrence Cake and Richard Fennemore for petitioner.
Solicitor General McGrath, J. Edward Williams and Roger P. Marquis for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
The motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.