Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John J. May et al., Respondents, v. The National Bank of Malone, Appellant, 1878 — 73 N.Y. 599 · caselaw · US
General
John J. May et al., Respondents, v. The National Bank of Malone, Appellant
73 N.Y. 599·New York Court of Appeals·1878·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John J. May et al., Respondents, v. The National Bank of Malone, Appellant.
(Submitted March 19,1878;
decided March 26, 1878.)
Gilbert, Badger & Weed for appellant.
S. A. Beman for respondents.
Agree to affirm.
[MAJORITY]
No opinion.
All concur, except Earl, J., dissenting, and Miller, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.