Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
BARNHART BROS. & SPINDLER et al. v. AMERICAN ASSEMBLING MACHINE CO., 1933 — 65 F.2d 1010 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
BARNHART BROS. & SPINDLER et al. v. AMERICAN ASSEMBLING MACHINE CO.
65 F.2d 1010·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BARNHART BROS. & SPINDLER et al. v. AMERICAN ASSEMBLING MACHINE CO.
No. 4760.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
May 8, 1933.
A. Miller Belfield, Walter E. Boye, and Prank Parker Davis, all of Chicago, 111., for appellants.
George A. Chritton, Russell Wiles, and Marcus A. Hirsehl, all of Chicago, 111., for appellee.
Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and SPARKS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Now this day comes counsel for appellants and presents a motion to dismiss this appeal, which said motion is in the following words and figures, to wit: ■
“Now come the defendants-hppellamts Barnhart Bros. & Spindler and Nonpareil Machine Company, and, showing to the Court that a settlement has been effected between them and Chester Snyder, Receiver for plaintiff-appellee, whereby for good and valuable consideration the defendants and each of them and their customers are released from all liability for past infringement and the said Chester Snyder, Receiver, assents to the voluntary dismissal of the appeals and assigns the patent in suit to the defendant Barnhart Bros. & Spindler, do hereby move for an order of dismissal of their appeals with a direction for a final decree, ‘vacating the injunctions! clause or clauses of the aforesaid decree heretofore entered, the same having been an interlocutory decree, and also vacating. the reference therein to a Master in Chancery to take and report an account of profits and damages, and also vacating the award of costs to the plaintiff therein, American Assembling Machine Company/ as in the executed agreement provided.
- “Barnhart Bros. & Spindler and “Nonpareil Machine Co.
“By F. P. Davis, of counsel.
“The foregoing motion is unopposed and further proceedings as therein proposed are assented to.
“George A. Chritton,
“Of counsel for Plaintiff-Appellee.”
Thereupon, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that this appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, and that this cause be, and the same is hereby, remanded to the said District Court, with direction to enter a decree in accordance with the foregoing motion.