Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
NATIONAL VENEER CO., Inc., v. LANGLEY, 1928 — 29 F.2d 403 · caselaw · US
General
NATIONAL VENEER CO., Inc., v. LANGLEY
29 F.2d 403·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NATIONAL VENEER CO., Inc., v. LANGLEY.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
November 27, 1928.
No. 2812.
Robert R. Parrish, of Richmond, Va., for appellant.
P. R. Hines, of Greenville, N. C., for appellee.
Before WADDILL, PARKER, and NORTHCOTT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The appellee has made a motion to dismiss the appeal in this case on the ground that the bill of exceptions was not signed within the time allowed by the court below. .We have examined the record; and we find that the contention of ap-pellee with regard to this matter is correct. The failure of appellant to have the bill of exceptions signed and allowed within the proper time, however, is not ground of motion to dismiss the appeal, but to strike the bill of exceptions from the record. Goet-zinger v. Woodley (C. C. A.) 17 F.(2d) 83. When the bill of exceptions is thus stricken, we review the primary record; and, if no error is apparent therein, the judgment below is affirmed.
In looking through the reeord in this case, however, we find no order allowing an appeal from the judgment below or approving the appeal bond. We have ordered all of the original papers in the ease sent up, and there is nothing in any of them to indicate that an appeal has been allowed. In this situation we cannot dismiss the appeal, as no appeal has been allowed, nor can we affirm the judgment below, as there is no appeal to bring it before us for review. All that we can do is to strike the cause from the docket of this court, and this will accordingly be done, and the original papers will be sent back to the District Court.
Remanded.