Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Louise MYSELL, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent; Hart L. WEAVER v. SAME; A. R. DENNIS v. SAME; Florence I. RICHARDSON, Executrix of the Estate of William L. Richardson, Deceased, v. SAME; James F. GURLEY v. SAME, 1932 — 58 F.2d 1083 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Louise MYSELL, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent; Hart L. WEAVER v. SAME; A. R. DENNIS v. SAME; Florence I. RICHARDSON, Executrix of the Estate of William L. Richardson, Deceased, v. SAME; James F. GURLEY v. SAME
58 F.2d 1083·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louise MYSELL, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. Hart L. WEAVER v. SAME. A. R. DENNIS v. SAME. Florence I. RICHARDSON, Executrix of the Estate of William L. Richardson, Deceased, v. SAME. James F. GURLEY v. SAME.
Nos. 6654-6658.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 20, 1932.
Philip G. Sheehy, of San Jose, Cal., and A. E. Cooley, of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioners.
G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and NETERER, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
These causes came on to be heard on the transcripts of record in the above causes, and upon the stipulations of counsel for the respective parties, contained in the transcripts, that the decision of thq United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on the petition to review in each of these causes shall abide the decision of said court in the companion ease of Chester N. Weaver v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, decided May 16, 1932, 58 F.(2d) 755.
Upon consideration whereof, it is ordered that a judgment of reversal be filed and altered in each of above causes.