Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. William Baker et al., Respondents, 1901 — 168 N.Y. 677 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. William Baker et al., Respondents
168 N.Y. 677·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. William Baker et al., Respondents.
People v. McKenna, 62 App. Div. 616, appeal dismissed.
(Argued November 12, 1901;
decided November 26, 1901.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made June 21, 1901, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion to vacate a judgment entered upon a forfeited recognizance and to set aside an execution issued thereon and granted such motion.
Eugene A. Philbvn, District Attorney (Charles E. le Barbier and Charles A. Skidmore of counsel), for appellant.
Robert C. Ta/ylor for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Yann and Landon, JJ.