Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John E. Heavner et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The City of Elkins, 1913 — 231 U.S. 743 · caselaw · US
General
John E. Heavner et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The City of Elkins
231 U.S. 743·Supreme Court of the United States·1913
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 103.
John E. Heavner et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The City of Elkins.
In error to the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of West Virginia.
Argued December 5, 8, 1913.
Decided December 15, 1913.
Mr. A. R. Stallings and Mr. Jas. A. Bent for the plaintiffs in error.
Mr. R. H. Allen for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs. Schaefer v. Werling, 188 U. S. 516; Detroit v. Parker, 181 U. S. 399, etc.