Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Department of Conservation and Development, Division of Parks, of Virginia, et al. v. Tate et al., 1956 — 352 U.S. 838 · caselaw · US
General
Department of Conservation and Development, Division of Parks, of Virginia, et al. v. Tate et al.
352 U.S. 838·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 238.
Department of Conservation and Development, Division of Parks, of Virginia, et al. v. Tate et al.
J. Lindsay Almond, Jr., Attorney General of Virginia, and Henry T. Wickham for petitioners. Victor J. Ashe, Oliver W. Hill, Thurgood Marshall and Spottswood W. Robinson, III for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.