Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Humble Oil & Refining Co. et al. v. Turnbow et al., 1940 — 311 U.S. 656 · caselaw · US
General
Humble Oil & Refining Co. et al. v. Turnbow et al.
311 U.S. 656·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 95.
Humble Oil & Refining Co. et al. v. Turnbow et al.
October 14, 1940.
Messrs. B.en H. Powell, Wy-man S. Gideon, John E. Green, Jr., andJoe S. Brown for petitioners. Messrs. Gerald C. Mann, Edgar Cole, James P. Hart, and Carl L. Phinney for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals, 3d Supreme Judicial District, of Texas, denied: