Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Saverio SCIORTINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIMON STEAMSHIP CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, 1930 — 44 F.2d 1019 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Saverio SCIORTINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIMON STEAMSHIP CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
44 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Saverio SCIORTINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIMON STEAMSHIP CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 42.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Nov. 3, 1930.
David M. Pink and Jaequin Prank, both of New York City, for appellant.
Burlingham, Yeeder, Pearey, Clark & Hupper, of New York City (Wm. Paul Allen and G. H. Merritt, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before SWAN and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment [39 F.(2d) 210] affirmed.