General
J. Burnet Nash, Respondent, v. Camille Weidenfeld et al., Appellants
166 N.Y. 612·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
J. Burnet Nash, Respondent, v. Camille Weidenfeld et al., Appellants.
Nash v. Weidenfeld, 41 App. Div. 511, affirmed.
(Argued March 8, 1901;
decided March 22, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 16, 1899, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Treadwell Cleveland for appellants.
Henry H. Abbott and William C. Breed for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Landon, JJ.