General
Martin Marietta Corp. v. Feder et al.
396 U.S. 1036·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 125.
Martin Marietta Corp. v. Feder et al.
Samuel E. Gates, Cecil Wray, Jr., and Clark C. Vogel for petitioner. Mordecai Rosenfeld for Feder and Charles Pickett and Edward C. McLean, Jr., for Sperry Rand Corp., respondents. Solicitor General Griswold, Lawrence G. Wallace, Philip A. Loomis, Jr., David Ferber, and Paul Gonson filed a memorandum for the United States, by invitation of the Court, ante, p. 808, in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.