Contracts · MBE-tested
Estella ANDERSON et al. v. COMPAGNIE MARITIME BELGE (LLOYD ROYAL) SOCIETY, Claimant of THE SS MERCIER, etc.
72 F.2d 1008·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Estella ANDERSON et al. v. COMPAGNIE MARITIME BELGE (LLOYD ROYAL) SOCIETY, Claimant of THE SS MERCIER, etc.
No. 7521.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 12, 1934.
For opinion below, see 5 F. Supp. 511.
William P. Lord, of Portland, Or., for appellant.
Wood, Montague, Mathiessen & Rankin and Erskine Wood, all of Portland, Or., for appellee.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and GARRECI1T, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon hearing oral arguments of proctors for respective parties, and consideration of the apostles on appeal and briefs filed in this cause, it is ordered that the decree of the District Court be affirmed, and that a decree be filed and entered accordingly.