Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edward C. Jones et al., Respondents, v. Charles F. Gale, as Receiver of The Elmira National Bank, Appellant, 1898 — 154 N.Y. 783 · caselaw · US
General
Edward C. Jones et al., Respondents, v. Charles F. Gale, as Receiver of The Elmira National Bank, Appellant
154 N.Y. 783·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward C. Jones et al., Respondents, v. Charles F. Gale, as Receiver of The Elmira National Bank, Appellant.
Jones v. Gale, 11 App. Div. 632, affirmed.
(Argued December 14, 1897;
decided January 11, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered December 23, 1896, upon an order affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
George J. Sica/rd for appellant.
Samuel D. Ilalliday for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.