Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Manufacturers Trust Co. et al. v. Prudence Securities Advisory Group et al.; Endelman et al. v. Prudence-Bonds Corp. et al.; Kelby, Trustee, v. Prudence Securities Advisory Group et al.; Prudence Realization Corp. v. Prudence-Bonds Corp.; and Davison v. Prudence Securities Advisory Group et al., 1941 — 312 U.S. 649 · caselaw · US
Securities
Manufacturers Trust Co. et al. v. Prudence Securities Advisory Group et al.; Endelman et al. v. Prudence-Bonds Corp. et al.; Kelby, Trustee, v. Prudence Securities Advisory Group et al.; Prudence Realization Corp. v. Prudence-Bonds Corp.; and Davison v. Prudence Securities Advisory Group et al.
312 U.S. 649·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 210.
No. 211.
No. 214.
No. 259.
No. 273.
Manufacturers Trust Co. et al. v. Prudence Securities Advisory Group et al.; Endelman et al. v. Prudence-Bonds Corp. et al.; Kelby, Trustee, v. Prudence Securities Advisory Group et al.; Prudence Realization Corp. v. Prudence-Bonds Corp.; and Davison v. Prudence Securities Advisory Group et al.
January 13, 1941.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted and the judgment is reversed on the authority of Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Prudence Securities Advisory Group, 311 U. S. 579.
Messrs. Dan Gordon Judge, John Ross Delafield, Edwin De T. Bechtel, Ralph W. Crolly, and Emery H. Sykes for petitioners in No. 210. Messrs. Jacob A. Freedman and Edward Endelman for petitioners in No. 211. Mr. Charles A. Frueauff for petitioner in No. 214. Mr. Irving L. Schanzer for petitioner in No. 259. Mr. Alfred T. Davison pro se, in No. 273.