Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Oregon Short Line Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Adda McManus, etc., 1907 — 207 U.S. 583 · caselaw · US
General
Oregon Short Line Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Adda McManus, etc.
207 U.S. 583·Supreme Court of the United States·1907
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 46.
Oregon Short Line Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Adda McManus, etc.
In error to the St. Louis Court of Appeals, State- of Missouri.
Submitted November 11, 1907.
Decided December 2, 1907.
Mr. Martin L. Clardy- and Mr. J. D. Howe for pláintiff in error. Mr. W. C. Marshall and Mr. Henry W. Bond for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Writ of error dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389; Dower v. Richards, 151 U. S. 658; Sayward v. Denny, 158 U. S. 180; Michigan Sugar Company v. Michigan, 185 U. S. 112; Mutual Life Insurance Company v. McGrew, 188 U. S. 291. See opinion below, 118 Mo. App. 152.