Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Brady Transfer & Storage Co. et al. v. United States et al., 1948 — 335 U.S. 875 · caselaw · US
General
Brady Transfer & Storage Co. et al. v. United States et al.
335 U.S. 875·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 397.
Brady Transfer & Storage Co. et al. v. United States et al.
Rex H. Fowler, John S. Burch-móre, Robert N. Burchmore and Nuel D. Belnap for the Brady Transfer & Storage Co.; and James E. Wilson for the Irregular Route Common Carrier Conference of the American Trucking Assns., Inc., appellants.
Solicitor General Perlman and Daniel W. Knowlton for the United States et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. United States v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp., 315 U. S. 475.