Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In re Disbarment of Dean, 1975 — 421 U.S. 984 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
In re Disbarment of Dean
421 U.S. 984·United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania·1975
Me. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Rehnquist took no part in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. D-42.
In re Disbarment of Dean.
[MAJORITY]
It having been reported to this Court that John W. Dean III, of Los Angeles, Cal., has been disbarred from the practice of law in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and this Court by order of February 24, 1975 [420 U. S. 942], having suspended the said John W. Dean III, from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;
And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time within which to file a return has expired;
It is ordered that the said John W. Dean III, be, and he is hereby, disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
Me. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Rehnquist took no part in the consideration or decision of this matter.