General
Dr. Dadirrian and Sons Company, Respondent, v. William Hauenstein, Appellant
175 N.Y. 522·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Dr. Dadirrian and Sons Company, Respondent, v. William Hauenstein, Appellant.
Dr. Dadirrian & Sons Co. v. Hauenstein, 74 App. Div. 630, affirmed.
(Argued June 16, 1908;
decided June 25, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 31, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
George J. McEwan and Frank M. Hardenbrook for appellant.
James R. Sheffield, Frederic H. Betts and James J. Cosgrove for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Hot voting: Parker, Oh. J.