Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jones et al., doing business as Jones & Haithcock Used Cars, v. Harper, Major General, United States Army, 1952 — 344 U.S. 821 · caselaw · US
General
Jones et al., doing business as Jones & Haithcock Used Cars, v. Harper, Major General, United States Army
344 U.S. 821·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 104.
Jones et al., doing business as Jones & Haithcock Used Cars, v. Harper, Major General, United States Army.
Duke Duvall for petitioners.
Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Baldridge, John F. Davis, Paul A. Sweeney and Hubert H. Margolies for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.