Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNION GUARDIAN TRUST COMPANY, Ernest C. Harris, and George H. Kirchner v. Honorable Fred M. RAYMOND, Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, 1933 — 67 F.2d 1014 · caselaw · US
General
UNION GUARDIAN TRUST COMPANY, Ernest C. Harris, and George H. Kirchner v. Honorable Fred M. RAYMOND, Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan
67 F.2d 1014·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNION GUARDIAN TRUST COMPANY, Ernest C. Harris, and George H. Kirchner v. Honorable Fred M. RAYMOND, Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan.
No. 6469.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
July 10, 1933.
Bulkley, Ledyard,- Dickinson & Wright, of Detroit, Mieh., for petitioners.
Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, of Detroit, Mieh., and Hudson & Coates, of Sault Ste. Marie, Mich., for respondent.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order denying petition for writ of prohibition.