Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Nickerson v. Bearfoot Sole Co., Inc., et al.; Lee et al. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al.; Davis et al. v. City of Bowling Green, Kentucky, et al.; Murdoch v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Cade v. Louisiana; Alker et al. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. et al.; Toles v. United States; Lansing v. New York; Hess et al. v. Kriz et al.; Sayles v. Ratcliff et al.; Whitney v. Wainwright, Corrections Director; Williams v. Tillett Brothers Construction Co., Inc., et al.; Thompson v. Missouri; Smith v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent, 1963 — 375 U.S. 949 · caselaw · US