Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Webster et al. v. Midland Electric Coal Corp. et al., 1964 — 377 U.S. 964 · caselaw · US
General
Webster et al. v. Midland Electric Coal Corp. et al.
377 U.S. 964·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1019.
Webster et al. v. Midland Electric Coal Corp. et al.
Sidney Z. Karasik for petitioners.
Hamilton K. Beebe for Midland Electric Coal Corp. et al., and William J. Voelker, Jr., Edmund Burke and Willard P. Owens for International Union, United Mine Workers of America, et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. Certiorari denied.