Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jacobellis v. Ohio, 1963 — 373 U.S. 901 · caselaw · US
General
Jacobellis v. Ohio
373 U.S. 901·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
April 29, 1963.
No. 164.
Jacobellis v. Ohio.
Ephraim London argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Martin Oarbus and Bennet Kleinman. John T. Corrigan argued the cause and filed a brief for appellee. Bernard A. Berkman, Jack G. Day and Melvin L. Wulf filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union et al:, as amici curiae, urging reversal.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Ohio. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 371 U. S. 808.) Argued March 26, 1963. This case is restored to the calendar for reargument.