General
WALKER v. UNITED STATES et al.
372 U.S. 526·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WALKER v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 657.
Decided March 18, 1963.
Henry W. Moursund, Maynard F. Robinson and R. Dean Moorhead for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Irwin A. Seibel and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al., and George Nokes, Roland Rice, Carl Wright Johnson and Nat L. Hardy for Central Freight Lines Inc. et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.