General
Charles E. Hubbell, as Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. The Syracuse Iron Works et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents
121 N.Y. 716·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles E. Hubbell, as Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. The Syracuse Iron Works et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents.
(Argued June 17, 1890;
decided June 24, 1890.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Oourt in the fourth judicial department, made April 29,1890, requiring the appellants to perfect their appeal to said General Term from a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at Special Term, or upon their failure to do so, dismissing said appeal.
M. M. Waters for appellants.
Henry A. Mayncvrd, William G. Tracy and E. Notting-Tiam for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Order affirmed.