Contracts · MBE-tested
William Wallace Grant, Respondent, v. Pratt & Lambert, Appellant
186 N.Y. 611·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William Wallace Grant, Respondent, v. Pratt & Lambert, Appellant.
Grant v. Pratt & Lambert, 110 App. Div. 867, affirmed.
(Argued December 4, 1906;
decided December 21, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 20, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover upon a written contract.
John G. Milium and George A. Miller for appellant.
Edward M. Shepard for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
•Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.; Haight, J., dissents on the ground that the arbitration clause in the contract is valid and binding on the parties.