Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
J. L. NEWLAND et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. SUPERIOR OIL CORPORATION, 1925 — 5 F.2d 1018 · caselaw · US
Corporations
J. L. NEWLAND et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. SUPERIOR OIL CORPORATION
5 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
J. L. NEWLAND et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. SUPERIOR OIL CORPORATION.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
January 20, 1925.)
No. 6751.
In error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Oklahoma.
John A. Fain, of Law-ton, Old., for plaintiffs in error. ■
Roger S. Sherman, A. A. Davidson, and Preston C. West, all of Tulsa, Old., for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Writ of error dismissed, with costs, per stipulation of parties.