Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mazer et al., doing business as June Lamp Manufacturing Co., v. Stein et al., doing business as Reglor of California, 1953 — 346 U.S. 811 · caselaw · US
IP
Mazer et al., doing business as June Lamp Manufacturing Co., v. Stein et al., doing business as Reglor of California
346 U.S. 811·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 228.
Mazer et al., doing business as June Lamp Manufacturing Co., v. Stein et al., doing business as Reglor of California.
Max R. Kraus and Robert L. Kahn for petitioners.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari granted. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief setting forth, along with other matters he deems pertinent, the views of the Copyright Office and a statement of its relevant practice.