Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
BENTON COUNTY v. ROLLENS, 1880 — 154 U.S. 665 · caselaw · US
General
BENTON COUNTY v. ROLLENS
154 U.S. 66526 L. Ed. 213·Supreme Court of the United States·1880
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BENTON COUNTY v. ROLLENS.
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OR THE UNITED STATES POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OR MISSOURI.
No. 147.
Argued December 15, 1880,
Decided December 20, 1880.
Scotland County v. Thomas, 94 U. S. 682, and Schuyler County v. Thomas, 98 U. S. 169, followed.
Mr. T. T. Crittenden for plaintiff in error.
Mr. John D. Stevenson and Mr. J. B. Henderson for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chier Justice Waite]
Mr. Chier Justice Waite
delivered the opinion of the court.
This judgment is affirmed on the authority of Scotland County v. Thomas, 94 U. S. 682, and Schuyler County v. Thomas, 98 U. S. 169. Under the rulings in those eases the amendment to the charter of the Osage Valley and Southern Kansas Bailroad Company adopted in 1871, and changing somewhat the route of the road, did not extinguish the power granted to counties by the origi. nal charter to subscribe to the stock of the company. The amendment was not a new charter, but an alteration of the old one in a way which left the power to subscribe in full force. Affiimed.