Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Melrose Distillers, Inc., et al. v. United States, 1958 — 358 U.S. 878 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
Melrose Distillers, Inc., et al. v. United States
358 U.S. 878·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 404.
Melrose Distillers, Inc., et al. v. United States.
Robert S. Marx and Hilary W. Gans for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen and Daniel M. Friedman for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit granted limited to question No. 1 presented by the petition for the writ which reads as follows:
“1. Can a Maryland corporation or a Delaware corporation be further criminally prosecuted (in a federal court for a federal offense) following its dissolution under the laws of the state of its creation occurring after indictment but before arraignment or plea, such dissolution timely appearing of record in the case?”
The Attorneys General of the States of Maryland and Delaware are invited to file briefs, as amici curiae, in this case if they are so advised.