Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Town of North Salem, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant, 1901 — 167 N.Y. 627 · caselaw · US
Corporations
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Town of North Salem, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant
167 N.Y. 627·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Town of North Salem, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant.
(Argued June 6, 1901;
decided June 21, 1901.)
People ex rel. Town of North Salem y. Gity of New York, 59 App. Div. 621, affirmed.
Appeal from an' order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 28, 1901, affirming an order of Special Term directing the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandamus commanding the defendant to construct a certain highway in the town of North Salem.
John Whalen, Corporation Counsel {Theodore Connoly and JET. T. DyT&man of counsel), for appellant.
Wilson Drown, Jr., for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Landon, Cullen and Werner, JJ.