Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Udall, Secretary of the Interior v. Tallman et al., 1964 — 379 U.S. 804 · caselaw · US
General
Udall, Secretary of the Interior v. Tallman et al.
379 U.S. 804·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 34.
Udall, Secretary of the Interior v. Tallman et al.
Clayton L. Orn, Marvin J. Sonosky, Oscar L. Chapman, Martin-L. Friedman and Marion B. Plant for Marathon Oil Co. et al., and Abe F orlas, Joseph A. Ball, Gordon A. Goodwin, Francis R. Kirkham and Clark M. Clifford for Richfield Oil Corp. et al., on the motions. Charles F. Wheatley, Jr., and Robert L. McCarty for respondents, in opposition to both motions.
[MAJORITY]
(Certiorari, 376 U. S. 961, to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.) The motions of Marathon Oil Co. et al. and Richfield Oil Corp. et al., for leave to file briefs, as amici curiae, are granted.