Contracts · MBE-tested
Flint Ridge Development Co. v. Scenic Rivers Association of Oklahoma et al.; Hills, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, et al. v. Scenic Rivers Association of Oklahoma et al.; Ralston Purina Co. et al. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al.
429 U.S. 875·Supreme Court of the United States·1976
Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 75-510.
No. 75-545.
No. 75-1015.
Flint Ridge Development Co. v. Scenic Rivers Association of Oklahoma et al., Hills, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, et al. v. Scenic Rivers Association of Oklahoma et al., Ralston Purina Co. et al. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al.,
[MAJORITY]
426 U. S. 776;
426 U. S. 776; and
426 U. S. 476. Petitions for rehearing denied.
Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.