Tax

TERRE HAUTE ELECTRIC COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

71 F.2d 1017·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1934

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

TERRE HAUTE ELECTRIC COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 4976. Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. June 25, 1934. Albert E. James, of Washing-ton, D. C., for petitioner. Frank J. Wideman, of Washington, D. C., for respondent. [MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.] PER CURIAM. Pursuant to the stipulation of counsel filed April 22, 1933, which provides that the decision of this court in cause No. 4973 and No. 4975, 67 F.(2d) 697 (B. T. A. Docket No. 33860), shall govern and determine the disposition of the petition for review in this cause, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that as to the issues raised on the petition for review by the Terre Haute Electric Company, Inc. (previously Terre Haute Traction & Light Company), the decision entered in this cause on June 29,1932, by the United States Board of Tax Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed. It is further ordered that the mandate in this cause issue forthwith.