Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Buffalo Dock Company, Respondent, v. Adolph Ladenburg et al., Appellants, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 626 · caselaw · US
General
The Buffalo Dock Company, Respondent, v. Adolph Ladenburg et al., Appellants
162 N.Y. 626·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Concur: Pabkeb, Oh. J., O’Bbibn, Babtlett, Haight, Mabtin, Vann and Landon, JJ.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Buffalo Dock Company, Respondent, v. Adolph Ladenburg et al., Appellants.
Buffalo Dock Co. v. Ladenburg, 19 App. Div. 35, affirmed.
(Argued March 9, 1900;
decided March 27, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered June 21, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Specia^Term.
Stevenson Burke and Adelbert Moot for appellants.
John G. Milburn for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion at Special Term.
Concur: Pabkeb, Oh. J., O’Bbibn, Babtlett, Haight, Mabtin, Vann and Landon, JJ.