Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles McManus, an Infant, by Alice McManus, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. St. Regis Paper Company, Appellant, 1907 — 188 N.Y. 556 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
Charles McManus, an Infant, by Alice McManus, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. St. Regis Paper Company, Appellant
188 N.Y. 556·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles McManus, an Infant, by Alice McManus, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. St. Regis Paper Company, Appellant.
(Argued February 26, 1907;
decided March 12, 1907.)
McManus v. St. Regis Paper Co., 112 App. Div. 903, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 28, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence.
Henry Purcell for appellant.
N. F. Breen for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; ho opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Not sitting: Hiscook, J.