General
William J. Mertz et al., Respondents, v. T. Channon Press, as Receiver of the Mapes-Reeve Construction Company, et al., Appellants
184 N.Y. 530·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William J. Mertz et al., Respondents, v. T. Channon Press, as Receiver of the Mapes-Reeve Construction Company, et al., Appellants.
Mertz v. Press, 99 App. Div. 443, affirmed.
(Argued January 25, 1906;
decided February 13, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 17, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Frederic J. Swift for appellants.
Ernest Hall for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, ITiscock and Chase, JJ.