General

Henry Berau, Appellant, v. Daniel O'Connell, Respondent

150 N.Y. 572·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Henry Berau, Appellant, v. Daniel O’Connell, Respondent. (Argued October 6, 1896; decided October 27, 1896.) Berim v. O’Gonndl, 80 Hun, 431, affirmed. Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered August 11, 1891, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term dismissing the complaint upon the merits, and also from an order of the General Term, made February 12,1891, granting a reargument of the appeal thereto, and setting aside a former order thereof reversing the judgment appealed from. Hector M. Ilitchings for appellant. Charles J. Patterson for respondent. [MAJORITY] Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion. All concur.