General
Thomson et al. v. California
383 U.S. 963·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Application for a stay presented to Mr. Justice Douglas, and by him referred to the Court, denied.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
April 1, 1966.
No. —.
Thomson et al. v. California.
Applicants pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and J. F. Coakley in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
Berkeley-
Albany Municipal Court, County of Alameda.
Application for a stay presented to Mr. Justice Douglas, and by him referred to the Court, denied.