General
CORINTH PUBLICATIONS, INC. v. WESBERRY et al.
388 U.S. 44887 S. Ct. 2096·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
The Chief Justice would grant the petition and set the case for oral argument. · Mr. Justice Clark would grant the petition and affirm. · Mr. Justice Harlan adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455, and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CORINTH PUBLICATIONS, INC. v. WESBERRY et al.
No. 227.
Decided June 12, 1967.
Stanley Fleishman for petitioner.
Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, and G. Ernest Tidwell, Executive Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Supreme Court of Georgia is reversed.
The Chief Justice would grant the petition and set the case for oral argument.
Mr. Justice Clark would grant the petition and affirm.
Mr. Justice Harlan adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455, and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.