Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James F. Taylor et al., Appellants, v. United States, 1918 — 246 U.S. 654 · caselaw · US
Securities
James F. Taylor et al., Appellants, v. United States
246 U.S. 654·Supreme Court of the United States·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 239.
James F. Taylor et al., Appellants, v. United States.
Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Submitted March 20, 1918.
Decided April 15, 1918.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Mr. R. E. Milling and Mr. E. H. Randolph for appellants.
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Kearful for the United States.
Judgment affirmed upon the authority of Washington Securities Co. v. United States, 234 U. S. 76, 78; Wright-Blodgett Co. v. United States, 236 U. S. 397, 402-405; Linn & Lane Timber Co. v. United States, 236 U. S. 574, 575, 576.