Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Montgomery County Board of Education et al.; and Carr et al. v. Montgomery County Board of Education et al., 1969 — 393 U.S. 1116 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. Montgomery County Board of Education et al.; and Carr et al. v. Montgomery County Board of Education et al.
393 U.S. 1116·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 798.
No. 997.
United States v. Montgomery County Board of Education et al.; and Carr et al. v. Montgomery County Board of Education et al.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Poliak, and Nathan Lewin for the United States in No. 798, and Fred D. Gray, Jack Green-berg, James M. Nabrit III, and Melvyn Zarr for petitioners in No. 997.
Vaughan Hill Robison and Joseph D. Phelps for respondents in both cases.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted. Cases consolidated and a total of two hours allotted for oral argument.